name: correct-architecture-go-ahead description: When the user approves a direction, build the correctly architected version without asking again metadata: type: feedback

On 2026-09-23 the user approved writing our own sans-I/O Jev protocol crate. The approval was phrased as "I gave go ahead to write correctly architected code". Asking again afterwards drew an angry reply: waiting for a second go-ahead reads as stalling.

Why: the user had already approved modular crates ([[modular-crates]]). A question like "is there prior art or could we write better?" with the answer "better" already means go.

How to apply: once research answers a build-vs-buy question the user asked, and they have approved the architecture style, build it in the same turn. Report what was built, not a proposal.